Healthcare professional taking a patient's pulse, illustrating whether or not thought leaders have one.

 

  • Most thought leadership content is too careful to lead anything.
  • Being safe and instantly forgotten is not doing a “good job” as an executive.
  • So what if you publish something somebody disagrees with? Good!
  • Is there a real you? Is that who shows up in your content? 
  • AI search is deciding what your brand is right now, with or without you.

Wanted: Thought Leaders with a pulse

Safe…it’s the new invisible!

If we’re being honest, most of today’s “thought leadership” from executives, founders, experts, whatever…doesn’t exhibit much thought, and it’s not really leading anything.

It’s very careful. Careful not to upset any apple carts, careful not to show any doubt or vulnerability, careful not to show any emotion, careful not to say anything that might make anyone uncomfortable, careful not to say anything someone might challenge.

You know…skull crushingly dull.

And while there’s a sense of safety your content is wrapped inside a great big condom, executive content that sounds written by committee, neutered by legal, and approved by someone who prides themselves on their fear, is going to turn around and bite you in the ass.

why so many leaders are afraid to lead

Somewhere along the way, executives became convinced being “professional” meant being less…human. They’ve modeled themselves on politicians who consider being fake a craft. So polished, so perfect, so measured, so adept and using lots of words to say nothing.

They stopped thinking out loud, being squeaky wheels, telling stories of things that happened to them and what they learned, stopped admitting mistakes, stopped pushing us forward and helping us dream. They started considering parroting safe observations in a toneless voice a “good job” at being an executive.

You may have noticed the public is washing its hands of politicians. They’re bankrupt of trust, and executives are close behind.

 

The hysterics want you to be safe, not make any waves, blend in. They’re killing your brand.

Why so serious?

Let’s play this out.

You publish something thoughtful. Someone disagrees. Good!

Everyone in the building might overreact and go hysterical, but what you’ve done is get people actually paying attention, during a war for attention. You’re right, the hysterics are wrong. They want you to be safe, not make any waves, not rock any boats, and blend in. They’re killing your brand.

The executive thought leadership content getting put out today gets scrolled past, fast. If people want to suck up to you, they might click “Like,” but often without even reading what you said. This isn’t thought leadership, it’s politely disappearing.

Um – you already got the job

Why are you writing like every executive who’s ever been on LinkedIn or in a company newsletter? Is there a real you?

You’re in the role you’re in because you’re qualified and you’ve got a brain in your head. Now tell me something that only you could say. And say it with confidence.

What you know, what you think, and your real personality aren’t liabilities or land mines, they’re your distinctive competitive advantage. But not if you hide it. Who are the business leaders you remember? Are they the safest people on the internet, or are they captivating and sometimes catch flack for being so?

 

If all AI search finds is interchangeable corporate messaging, you have more than earned your invisibility. 

I’m not saying to always be controversial. I’m saying say what you think. Controversy’s not the goal, recognition is. The slick, polished, and safe aren’t leaders. They’re just people keeping a seat warm.

Blending in isn’t caution, it’s suicide

Was the road to your position easy? No. You spent decades going through fire and learning. Then you publish “People are our most important asset.” Come on.

Yes, there was a time SEO trickery and keyword-stuffing used to do your brand some good. But now Google, and definitely AI search, are trying to answer, “who consistently demonstrates real expertise?” Authority, originality, consistency, clarity, semantic association, reputation…none of that is optional anymore.

AI search is forming its opinion of you right now. With or without you. It looks well beyond channels you control. If you don’t have interesting ideas being cemented across channels and formats, you are not going to like the identity graph around you. If all it finds is interchangeable corporate messaging, you have more than earned your invisibility.

AI, and the communications teams that have surrendered their cognition to it, have gotten really good at generating that interchangeable corporate messaging. Don’t let your thought leadership succumb. AI recognizes AI slop, and hates it, and hides it.  

your ideas and opinions are worth fighting for

Think about “famous” people. Musicians, actors, even reality stars and influencers. They’re known for something. It’s a prerequisite.

What are you known for?

It’s not a trick question, but the answer can’t be your title. What idea(s) are you known for? What do people think when they think about you? Do they think about you?

Ironically, AI has increased the value of being unmistakably human. That’s what connects, that’s what triggers emotion, that’s what motivates action, that’s what builds relationships, that’s what builds trust.

So how “human” are you being in your content?

What I don’t want you to do is waste this opportunity in which the business world is starving for real leadership. Don’t waste the position you’ve earned. Don’t waste the pain and lessons that got you there. Don’t waste your intuition. Don’t waste your ideas and opinions. Don’t waste this stage you temporarily have (and EVERYTHING is temporary).

 


Who said this?

I’m an executive presence developer. I work with executives to hone a unique POV for breakthrough thought leadership content, then get their team ready to perpetually execute on it across channels and formats.

 

Embarrassed woman with fingers pointing at her because she was caught doing bad thought leadership.

 

  • There is no value in content that has no value.
  • Voices that are distinct and full of character get elevated.
  • No one owes you their time and attention just because you published something.
  • Most people don’t want to look bad, but way too many executives don’t seem to mind.
  • If you hate this article, that’s fantastic.

Caught Ya: AI Exposes How Little Thought Leadership There Really Is

A funny thing happened on the way to executives pushing out content about how great AI is, often written by AI. AI turned right around and exposed them for not having captivating or original thoughts.

Do you feel content getting less and less valuable?

We’ve all been subjected to this content. LinkedIn, YouTube, even major business publications are choking on it. Collectively, it’s making business content on all these platforms boring and imminently skippable.

Don’t blame AI, or even old school SEO. This sameness and lack of vision and personality was there long before AI came along. The fact that first Google, and then AI search, started rewarding content that said something new, or elevated voices that were distinct and full of character in the way the ideas were framed, just makes getting by on pablum less viable.

And don’t lie to yourself, it is less viable.

No one owes you anything

Too much executive communication and thought leadership has been nothing more than marketing copy. Yeah, we know you like your company. We know you think your product/service is better than seedless watermelon.

ALARM BELL: Your audience of prospects and customers (the audience is not you, or the people you pay to also like your company, and not your spouse) don’t obsess over what you’re selling all day every day like you do. They don’t owe you a thing, including their time and attention.

That attention (and you may have heard we’re in a war for that) has to be earned. If the Supergirl movie taught us anything, it’s that you can’t just put out something lame expecting everyone to go see it just because you put money and effort into making it.

Looking lame is not acceptable

So here you are, a big-time executive, and not only is your brand pushing out stuff just to say you did and to make the internet a little bigger, you’re allowing your name to be put down as the author of some of it. Are you nuts? Most people don’t want to look bad.

A friend of mine, who is in marketing and content, just returned from a conference in London. Now you would think that to be chosen to be on a panel or speak at a conference, the presenters would have some takeaways. But just like the internet has become, every single session was the same message all attendees already knew: AI is here to stay, it’s amazingly useful, but there’s still some human element that should remain in the work.

Oh…my…God.

Just stop doing it

Even if you aren’t writing your own executive content and you have your marketing people doing it with almost zero input from you, if it contains any iteration of…

“I’m excited to announce…”

“Innovation has never been more important…”

“People are our greatest asset…”

“Here are five trends shaping our industry…”

…please stop. We have that article already. 30,765 times.

If the goal of your thought leadership is to never say anything that will challenge anyone or that anyone will challenge, anything objectionable, anything not safe & sanitized, anything interesting or memorable, then just don’t. Either that or explain to us how “invisible” is strategic.

What AI search cares about

AI has industrialized generic content, and is turning right around and punishing it by making sure your generic content remains ignored. Congrats, you’ve made mediocrity faster and more efficient.

LLMs want to know:
Who consistently demonstrates real, and not parroted, expertise?
Who has a point of view that can’t be found anywhere else?
Who is repeatedly associated with a topic?
Who frames their original ideas in a voice and terminology that can’t be copied (semantics)?

Why do I say you shouldn’t sound like marketing copy? Marketing exists to persuade. It’s needy and often smells desperate. Thought leadership exists to interpret, teach, explain, forecast, make sense of things, help as an ally. It has a special sauce containing both empathy and swagger.

I want to know:

  • What have you seen that others haven’t?
  • What have you changed your mind about?
  • What do people in your industry keep getting wrong?
  • Where have your scars given you better judgment?
  • What can you no longer stay silent about?

The executive thought leadership challenge

Your experience is a major piece of your competitive advantage. Why bury it in favor of an entry-level marketing person using AI to draft up some BS that your name will go on and that you will be judged by? All AI does is summarize consensus. We don’t need your “Me too.”

Consider trying this:

  • Quit trying to sound like a slick, polished executive.
  • Sound like you.
  • Be recognizable.
  • Have opinions.
  • Tell stories.
  • Be challenging.
  • Be transparent and vulnerable.
  • Call things out.
  • Say something worth remembering.

That’s how authority is built.

Welcome to the age of the functioning brain

If you absolutely hated this article, I think that’s fantastic. Because I got you to feel something. You read the whole thing, and I sounded like few other people you read. You’ll remember me 10 minutes from now. You might even lay in bed wondering if I’m right.

The age of the executive leader with a brain of their own and something important to say is upon us.

 


Who said this?

I’m an executive presence developer. I work with executives to hone a unique POV for breakthrough thought leadership content, then get their team ready to perpetually execute on it across channels and formats.